← Back to case studies
Case study

Over 102,000 emails to independent fitness operators for Fitmanager

102K
Emails
1,175
Replies
Category
SaaS
Industry
Fitness operations software
HQ
United States
Engagement
8.5 months

About Fitmanager

Fitmanager builds the X-One SE Scale and Smart Mirror: hardware and software that turn a fitness or wellness business's body-composition capture into a personalization and retention layer.

Six industry-leading frequency points, front-facing Lidar, a 47-inch interactive display, and a software stack that runs automated fitness challenges, AI-logged workout and nutrition tracking, and personalized meal plans on top of the scan data. The buyer is a gym owner, supplement-store operator, or wellness-clinic principal who already invested in a basic InBody scale and knows there's more they could do with that capture, but doesn't have the software layer to activate it.

The challenge

What we did

01

InBody-upgrade positioning as the campaign wedge.

  • Filtered the target list to businesses already running InBody scales, visible from Google listings, storefronts, or website product pages.
  • Every campaign opened by acknowledging the hardware the prospect already owned, then positioned Fitmanager as the software and Smart Mirror layer that unlocked its value.
  • Prospects without InBody were excluded from this track and became a separate top-of-funnel push, not part of the upgrade book.
02

Three parallel vertical tracks, each with its own value language.

  • Supplement stores heard about customers spending 3x more per visit and turning buyers into loyal customers who return to see supplement progress.
  • Gyms and fitness centers heard about 3x better retention and an added revenue stream through automated challenges and personalized meal plans.
  • Wellness centers and clinics heard about clients spending 3x more per visit and turning one-time visitors into repeat progress-tracking clients.
Same product, same platform. Three completely different money hooks. The vertical drives the framing, not the other way around.
03

Two variants per vertical, tested in parallel.

  • Variant 1, peer-to-peer consultative: "I've been helping supplement stores with InBody scales unlock significantly more revenue. Would sharing what's working be valuable?" Written to sound like a peer operator sharing a pattern.
  • Variant 2, personalized observable: built from something specific we could see about that exact business, a named trainer or program pulled from its Google reviews.
  • Every campaign ran both variants concurrently, so reply-rate attribution split by opener style, not just by vertical.
04

Four-email sequence with progressive specificity.

  • Email 1: hook plus product intro. One observable, one paragraph on Fitmanager, one soft ask.
  • Email 2: three concrete implementation ideas mapped to their specific business, named challenges and named staff, not a re-pitch.
  • Email 3: brief re-surface with product specs as parenthetical asides (front-facing Lidar, 47-inch display, platform-hosted challenges).
  • Email 4: a ten-word bump, no re-pitch: "Should I reach out to someone else on your team, or not the right timing?"
05

Google-Reviews-and-observable personalization at scale.

  • Scraped Google Reviews on every prospect for the named trainer, program signature, or on-floor moment recent visitors called out. Real detail, never a name pulled from a title field.
  • Detected existing InBody hardware from Google Business listings, storefront photos, and product pages to qualify the upgrade angle before the send.
  • Named specific business programs inside Email 2's three implementation ideas, so the ideas felt written for this business, not the vertical.
Fitmanager (X-One SE) · [business name]Variant 2
Hey [first name], [named trainer]'s meticulous approach to training stands out in your Google reviews (most other gyms still use clipboards and hope). With a competitive fitness market demanding personalized experiences, how are you handling the need for improved customer personalization?

Our Smart Scale (X-One SE) and software ecosystem captures comprehensive body composition and provides automated progress tracking, eliminating manual assessments while keeping members engaged. Gyms turn occasional visitors into long-term members through visible progress tracking.

Worth a quick look?
Anonymized. The bracketed slots are personalization variables filled from the prospect's own Google reviews and business type. Every send was written for one business, not one vertical.

Results

102,675
Emails sent across 8.5 months of active campaigning
1,175
Total replies received across all reply categories

Key performance highlights

  • Three-vertical campaign structure (supplement stores, gyms and fitness centers, wellness centers and clinics) each with its own copy conversation.
  • Two-variant testing per vertical ran on every campaign, so reply-rate attribution split by opener style, not just by audience.
  • InBody-upgrade positioning filtered every send to a business we could genuinely unlock, and every opener led with what the prospect already owned.
  • Progressive-specificity sequence: the fourth email was ten words, the second named the business's own programs. Never a re-pitch of email one.
Emails sent
102,675
Total replies
1,175
Engagement
8.5 mo
Free test campaign

Want results like these on your ICP?

Apply below. If we're a fit, we run a real pilot on your ICP and show you the actual replies before you commit to anything.